Cases 31 - 40 of 42
PINEDA G. v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00836
Plaintiff:
CARLOS E. PINEDA G.
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, WHITE HOUSE, ALBERTO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NEWMAN MCINTOSH & HENNESSEY LLP v. BUSH
as 1:2008cv00787
Plaintiff:
NEWMAN MCINTOSH & HENNESSEY LLP
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ACUMEN LEGAL SERVICES (INDIA) PVT., LTD., ACUMEN SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LYSYJ v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00735
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LYSYJ, JR.,
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, LAURA BUSH and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RUIZ v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00135
Plaintiff:
PAUL RUIZ
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, PETER D. KEISLER and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAIGE v. BUSH et al
as 1:2007cv01542
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE PAIGE
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH and DICK CHENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWBY v. BUSH et al
as 1:2007cv01406
Plaintiff:
BETTY ANN NEWBY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, DICK CHENEY, GEORGE H. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. BUSH
as 1:2007cv01312
Plaintiff:
VONDA KAY CORNELIUS WALKER
Defendant:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ORLOSKI v. AVUE DIGITAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2007cv01248
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE ORLOSKI
Defendant:
AVUE DIGITAL SERVICES, U. S. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, GEORGE WALKER BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2007cv00954
Plaintiff:
ANN POWERS
Defendant:
BILL CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
