Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Bryant v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2011cv06352
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Bryant
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Holder Jr., et al
as 1:2011cv05286
Plaintiff:
Bryant C Jones
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Robert Mueller, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholas et al v. melson et al
as 1:2011cv04367
Plaintiff:
Jerry Nicholas and Joanne Nicholas
Defendant:
Bryant Melson and Unidentified CPD Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shorts v. Village Of Calumet Park et al
as 1:2011cv04010
Plaintiff:
George Shorts
Defendant:
Village Of Calumet Park and Bryant Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryant v. Lent et al
as 1:2011cv01321
Plaintiff:
Reggie Bryant
Defendant:
James Lent , Steven Hill , Cook County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Office of Illinois Attorney General et al
as 1:2010cv06449
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Office of Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, Fotopolous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corder et al v. Sebastian et al
as 1:2010cv01927
Plaintiff:
Eric Bryant Corder and Elizabeth Corder
Defendant:
Clinton Sebastian, Donna Walsh and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Phoenix Police Dept. et al
as 1:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Survitis D. Phillips
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Dept. and Bennie Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bryant v. Kankakee County Courthouse et al
as 2:2009cv02286
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bryant
Defendant:
Kankakee County Courthouse, Kids Hope United of Kankakee, Kelly McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv02593
Plaintiff:
Edrinna Bryant, Edrinna Bryant, Edrinna Bryant and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
