Cases 41 - 50 of 66
DANA'S RAILROAD SUPPLY et al v. BONDI
as 1:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
DANA'S RAILROAD SUPPLY , DANA JACKSON , TM JEWELRY LLC and others
Defendant:
PAMELA JO BONDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS et al v. WILEY
as 4:2013cv00670
Plaintiff:
BOB NICHOLS , NELSON NICHOLS and DAMON NICHOLS
Defendant:
NICK WILEY , JOHN ALLEN , TRAVIS HUCKABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foudy et al v. Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2012cv14462
Plaintiff:
Toni Foudy and Shaun Foudy
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Indian River County Sheriffs Office, Gerald M. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAWKINS v. DIMITROULEAS
as 4:2012cv00476
Plaintiff:
ELKINO DENARDO DAWKINS
Defendant:
DIMITROULEAS, WILLIAMS, SEITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooks v. Bailey et al
as 3:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Cooks
Defendant:
Jason Bailey , C. Brown , R. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adlesperger v. Cook et al
as 8:2012cv01242
Plaintiff:
Greg Adlesperger
Defendant:
Martha J. Cook, Christopher C. Sabella, Mark R. Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIS v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2012cv00182
Defendant:
SKIP SHIVER, CITY OF APALACHICOLA, RANDALL COOK and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BENJAMIN WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. YOST
as 3:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RAYE FOWLER
Defendant:
LOUIS ALLEN YOST, CHRISTIAN ALLAN COAD, ROBERT EUGENE COOK, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. THOMAS
as 3:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
MARK CHAPMAN HARRIS, G S H and T C H
Defendant:
JANICE THOMAS, LISA CARDIN, WALT COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
