Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 41 - 50 of 828
Nave v. Wells et al
as 1:2022cv03566
Plaintiff: Dr. Ken S. Nave
Defendant: Christy Wells, Peter Theiler, Cathy Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Payne v. Doe
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff: Michael Payne
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Chris Hillas et al
as 1:2022cv03268
Plaintiff: Nokomis Jefferson
Defendant: Officer Chris Hillas, Officer George Castro, Officer Marcia Fambro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv02857
Plaintiff: Jabari-Abdu: Walker
Defendant: J.B. Pritzker, City, The, Richard Irvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.G., et al v. Chicago Police Officer John Doe, al
as 1:2022cv02775
Plaintiff: A.G. and Cierra Corbitt
Defendant: Chicago Police Officer John Doe and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Gearhart et al
as 2:2022cv02110
Plaintiff: Samara Jordan
Defendant: Marci Gearhart, Jennings, Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Asa #2449 et al
as 1:2022cv02702
Plaintiff: Aaron Lewis
Defendant: Ert Michael Asa, Ert Daniel Herod, Deputy Mark Fletcher and others
Intervenor: C. Norris Law Group. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Arrietta v. P.O. John Doe 1-2
as 1:2022cv02625
Plaintiff: Christian Arrietta
Defendant: P.O. John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Approximately 10 John Doe's
as 3:2022cv50129
Plaintiff: Kareem Solomon Bey
Defendant: Approximately 10 John Doe's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hobbs v. Bauch et al
as 1:2022cv01924
Plaintiff: Lawrence Houston Hobbs
Defendant: Reva S Bauch, Charles R Vaith, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?