Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Cowboys for Life et al v. Sampson et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cowboys for Life , Jennifer M Ortman and Joshua R Bowman
Defendant:
Brian K Sampson, Lee Bird, Burns Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heard v. UPS Inc
as 5:2012cv01280
Plaintiff:
Rhonda K Heard
Defendant:
UPS Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Pruett v. Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners
as 5:2012cv00947
Plaintiff:
Teresa Pruett
Defendant:
Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners and Joseph K Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Hugo Alberto Gutierrez
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, John K Gray, Harold Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. B&K Foods, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bertha Lynn Rogers
Defendant:
B&K Foods, LLC , BNF Food/Simple Simon's Pizza and J & H Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nickles v. Dan OBriens Public House
as 5:2011cv01229
Plaintiff:
Debraha K Nickles
Defendant:
Dan O'Briens Public House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbreath et al v. Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
Suzanne M Gilbreath
Defendant:
Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners , Joseph K Lester , Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodnight v. Lester et al
as 5:2011cv00691
Plaintiff:
Chase Goodnight
Defendant:
Joseph K Lester and University of Oklahoma Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon v. Craig County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Roger K Dixon
Defendant:
Jimmy Sooter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bartlesville, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Martez Smith
Defendant:
Bartlesville, City of , Washington County Board of County Commissioners , Adam K Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
