Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Green v. Quick et al
as 3:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Jade Green
Defendant:
Chris Quick, Russell Adams, Jack Howser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kondrat v. Village of Westchester et al
as 1:2016cv07147
Plaintiff:
Mark E Kondrat
Defendant:
Village of Westchester , Adam Rauglas , Kristina Tountas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Antonio Baker v. P.O. Robert A. Vahl et al
as 1:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Antonio Baker
Defendant:
P.O. Robert A. Vahl, P.O. Augle, P.O. Russell and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Musson et al v. Swanson et al
as 1:2015cv07709
Plaintiff:
Arona M Musson and Michael R Musson
Defendant:
Greg Swanson, Alan Burns, Wendell Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv05593
Plaintiff:
Darius Russell
Defendant:
City of Chicago, T. F. Frole and B. Manjarrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
Brandon Russell and Aaliyah Russell-Morgan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Community Youth Development Institution, Xavier Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Hines, Star #20856 et al
as 1:2014cv10216
Plaintiff:
Quinton Russell
Defendant:
Chicago Police Detective Jeremiah Hines, Star #20856, Chicago Police Officer P. Lorde, Star #12405, Chicago Police Officer M. Gaines, Star #6030 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. TransUnion
as 1:2014cv08488
Plaintiff:
Melody A Russell
Defendant:
TransUnion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rotter v. Elk Grove Village et al
as 1:2014cv07583
Plaintiff:
Roger Rotter
Defendant:
Elk Grove Village , John Williams and Russell Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv01840
Plaintiff:
Russell Bailey
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Patricia Cipun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
