Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Obufa v. Walmart et al
as 6:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
Tom Obufa
Defendant:
Walmart, City of Holly Hill Florida Police Department, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison et al v. Doe #1 et al
as 9:2008cv80989
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Harrison and Gregory T. Harrison
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Usbaldo Lara and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sada v. City of Altamonte Springs et al
as 6:2008cv01368
Plaintiff:
James R. Sada
Defendant:
City of Altamonte Springs, Robert C. Merchant, Jr., Robert Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRETT v. NIGRO
as 1:2008cv00107
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
CHRIS WALDRON, ANGELO NIGRO, CHRISTINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawson v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Rosella J. Lawson
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kabul v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2007cv61809
Plaintiff:
Zeffry Kabul and Zeffry Kabul
Defendant:
City of Hollywood, Matthew L. Goodnow, A. De La Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kloke v. City of Miami Beach et al
as 1:2007cv22861
Plaintiff:
Philipp Kloke and Philipp Kloke
Defendant:
City of Miami Beach, William Sinkes, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. City of Port St. Lucie, Florida et al
as 2:2007cv14053
Plaintiff:
Denise N. Johnson and Lishomwa D. Henry
Defendant:
City of Port St. Lucie, Florida, City of Port St. Lucie, Florida, Port St. Lucie Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ramos
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, W. R. Messick, L. B. Nelson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
