Cases 51 - 60 of 18,127
Clements v. City of Fort Myers
as 2:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
City of Fort Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Girtman v. State Attorney Gen Supervision et al
as 8:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Calen T. Girtman
Defendant:
State Attorney Gen Supervision, Secretary, State of Florida, Grady Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benford v. Ferman Chevrolet and Mazda of Tampa
as 8:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Latrese Benford
Defendant:
Ferman Chevrolet and Mazda of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitton et al v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv14097
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitton and Marjorie Whitton
Defendant:
Keith Pearson, Cortney Hoyt and Mark Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Louis v. Lasership, INC.
as 8:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
LOUIDOR LOUIS
Defendant:
LASERSHIP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Council et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Bank of America Co
Claimant:
LUCINDA COUNCIL, RAVYNNE GILMORE, VERNA MAITLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heard v. Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
as 8:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Tamoris Heard
Defendant:
Mahakal Sahai d/b/a 7 Eleven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shah et al v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21143
Plaintiff:
Kartik Shah, Purvi Shah and A. S.
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Maragh v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21145
Plaintiff:
Sasha Maragh
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Odonoghue v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant:
Judge Joseph C Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
