Cases 61 - 70 of 80
ROSSMANN v. WICHLINSKI et al
as 1:2017cv00716
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. WICHLINSKI, JOHN DOE-1, JOHN DOE-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BALL v. MARICOPA COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JOHN DOES 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GOOLSBY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv02029
Plaintiff:
JASON GOOLSBY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RICHARDSON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
ANDRE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. SMITH , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv02069
Plaintiff:
MARC S. BARNES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JONATHAN CLINGERMAN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WEISS v. PROJECT CREATE et al
as 1:2015cv00683
Plaintiff:
KIRSTEN WEISS
Defendant:
PROJECT CREATE , CHRISTIE WALSER , KIRA MARCHENESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM J. SMITH and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
GASKIN et al v. MAY et al
as 1:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
SEAN GASKIN , JOHN SCANTLEBURY and FREDERICK CHRISTOPHER HAWKESWORTH
Defendant:
STEPHEN MAY, GORDON PATTEN, JR, JODI I AVERGUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WALLACE v. US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS et al
as 1:2014cv01931
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Defendant:
US SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS and JOHN DOES 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01316
Plaintiff:
ELLA LANE , ADRIAN CROSSLAND and TERRENCE CROSSLAND
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , JOHN WRIGHT and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
