Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Shoop v. NV Energy et al
as 3:2012cv00101
Defendant:
Carson City, City of, Charter Communications, NV Energy and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Shoop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huff v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00235
Plaintiff:
Keith Huff
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oleary v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
MD Cornelius Joseph Oleary, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brodzki v. Jacks et al
as 2:2011cv02060
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Brodzki
Defendant:
Jimmy Jacks and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atwood v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01692
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Atwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Holder et al
as 2:2011cv01679
Defendant:
Arthur Herbert, Eric H. Holder, Jr., B Todd Jones and others
Plaintiff:
S Rowan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bravo v. Nevada, State Of
as 3:2011cv00748
Plaintiff:
Rene D. Bravo
Defendant:
Nevada, State Of and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv01572
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
Leo Basch, Barry Boudreaux, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Connors v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00345
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Connors
Defendant:
Google Inc., Research In Motion Ltd., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Colter v. LaHood et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Richard Glen Colter
Defendant:
Ray LaHood, Brian Sandoval, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
