Cases 81 - 90 of 18,061
Sims v. Urizar et al
as 6:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jejuan Sims
Defendant:
Gaby Aparicio Urizar and EXP Realty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEREE v. CITY OF MIAMI
as 1:2024cv21706
Plaintiff:
DUFIRSTSON NEREE
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. HomeGood's Corp et al
as 0:2024cv60739
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Hudson
Defendant:
HomeGood's Corp and Raheem Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yearicks IV v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2024cv20854
Plaintiff:
Earl Frank Yearicks IV
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, J.T. Barret, N. Silva Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marshall v. BK7 Restaurants LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80566
Plaintiff:
Danette Marshall
Defendant:
BK7 Restaurants LLC and Seven Restaurant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Koch v. Genesis Reference Laboratories, LLC
as 6:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Kersey Koch
Defendant:
Genesis Reference Laboratories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
A Fresh Start Mennonite et al BPOA v. Volusia County Agents et al
as 6:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
A Fresh Start Mennonite et al BPOA
Defendant:
Volusia County Agents and Volusia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Romero et al
as 6:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cindy Elaine Washington
Defendant:
Michael Romero, Suze Susaline, Michelle Baptiste and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goolst v. Madoff et al
as 9:2024cv80323
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Steven Goolst
Defendant:
Scott Madoff and Monarch Care Guardians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
