Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Randolph v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05845
Plaintiff:
James Randolph
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv07704
Defendant:
David Taylor, Star No. 18525, Timothy Loring, Star No. 4769, Erik Haney, Star No. 3591 and others
Plaintiff:
Shontaa Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon-Randolph et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Plaintiff:
Toya Dixon-Randolph and CITY OF CHICAGO CITY OF CHICAGO
Defendant:
Chicago Parking Meters, LLC and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2016cv02321
Plaintiff:
Willie Randolph
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Adam P Monreal, Victor P Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Harrison & Kedzie Police Station
as 1:2015cv10581
Defendant:
Tydus Martez Randolph, Harrison & Kedzie Police Station and Officer Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Homan and filmore police station
as 1:2015cv10578
Plaintiff:
Tydus Martez Randolph
Defendant:
Homan and filmore police station
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randolph v. Gliniewicz et al
as 1:2015cv10310
Plaintiff:
Vernon Randolph, III
Defendant:
Charles Joseph Gliniewicz, Village of Fox Lake, Donny Schmit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Hoelscher et al
as 3:2013cv00442
Plaintiff:
William Edward Rainey
Defendant:
Mike Hoelscher, Christopher Geisen, Jason Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson, Austin S. Randolph, Jr., Lori Fishel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
