Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery County of et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County of, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Greyhound Lines Inc
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lietzke v. Birmingham City of et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Birmingham City of and Patrick D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
