Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cuara R. v. Cayman National Bank et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Cayman National Bank, Scotiabank Cayman Islands, HSBC Bermuda Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Daybreak Utah Homes et al
as 2:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Daybreak Utah Homes, Miller Real State Group, Station at Gardner Mill Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
CLAY JAMES CARTER
Defendant:
TRAVIS MARVIN KENISON, ZERA AUGUSTUS ROWLEY and CHASE NATHAN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery et al v. Nesbitt et al
as 2:2018cv00614
Defendant:
Utah State Bureau of Investigation, Salt Lake Public Corruption Tast Force, Michelle Pickens and others
Plaintiff:
Chase Montgomery, JD Montgomery and Robert Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Porter et al
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dan Robinson , Jill Robinson , Andrew Adamson and others
Defendant:
Stacey Porter, Porter Building Systems, Robert S. West Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Taylor, Dillon the Estate of et al v. Salt Lake City et al
as 2:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
Taylor, Dillon the Estate of , Cody Taylor , Jerrail Taylor and others
Defendant:
Salt Lake City, City of South Salt Lake, Salt Lake County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero et al v. Weber County Utah et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lucero , Chase Aeschilmann , James Rivas and others
Defendant:
Weber County Utah , Ogden Police Department , Dee Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kahn v. iBiquity Digital et al
as 2:2009cv00814
Plaintiff:
Leonard R. Kahn
Defendant:
iBiquity Digital, Lucent Technologies, Clear Channel Communications and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
