Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mohammad v. Rio Metro Regional Transit et al
as 1:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
Rio Metro Regional Transit, United States of America, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynt v. Berry et al
as 1:2013cv00633
Defendant:
FNU Berry, City of Albuquerque Planning Department, City of Albuquerque City Council and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Sue Flynt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klipping v. Peters et al
as 1:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Dennis Klipping
Defendant:
Mary E. Peter and Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gabaldon v Acosta et al
as 1:2009cv00696
Plaintiff:
Annine Gabaldon
Defendant:
Jessica Acosta, Jeffrey Maldonado, Zeke Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Muckerheide v. New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department et al
as 1:2008cv01159
Plaintiff:
William Arnold Muckerheide
Defendant:
New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, Town of Tisbury, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellison et al v. New Mexico Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Robert Ellison and Marci Ellison
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Transportation, Lester Cisneros, Harvey Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mayfield v State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2007cv00524
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mayfield
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, New Mexico Department of Transportation, George Harney, Ronald Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield
as 6:2007cv00524
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mayfield
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, New Mexico Department of Transportation, George Harney and Ronald Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
