Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SMITH v. TIBBEF
as 1:2021cv01871
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPUTY MARSHAL and TIBBEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. FRANKLIN
as 1:2017cv01609
Plaintiff:
SHEWANDA R.M. PRICE
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CAVE v. MARTINI
as 1:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANKLIN CAVE
Defendant:
SHAENA FROST MARTINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E. FINCH, SCOTT A. RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHEWS-BAKER v. REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al
as 1:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE MATHEWS-BAKER
Defendant:
REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., ROUSE, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUCK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01289
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANKLIN BUCK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN 1-25 DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2008cv01604
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRYSON CHANE, JOSEPH M. PALACIOS, ROY CRABTREE and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAWKINS v. LANIER et al
as 1:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
BRYAN G. HAWKINS
Defendant:
CATHY LANIER, CATHY LANIER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETTIES, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al
as 1:1995cv00148
Plaintiff:
NIKITA SHONTA PETTIES , SUSAN ZELAYA , ELVAMARIE ZELAYA and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , FRANKLIN L. SMITH , B. GARNETT PINKNEY and others
Pecial_master:
Elise T. Baach
Amicu:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 20, LOCAL 1959, AFL-CIO and TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 639
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
