Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Poulos et al v. City of Monte Vista et al
as 1:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Poulos and Mark Jason Youngers
Defendant:
City of Monte Vista, Joshua Hill, Joshua (I) Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendoza et al v. Douglas et al
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mendoza, Raymond Barnett, Terrence McNeal and others
Defendant:
Steven T. Nnjchin, Charles Rettig, United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowman v. Adams County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Nick Bowman, Jr
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriffs Dept., Adam K. Shadi-Kingsley, Daniel E. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Niedzwiecki v. City of Loveland et al
as 1:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NIEDZWIECKI
Defendant:
CITY OF LOVELAND and ANTOLINA HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elias v. Loveland, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Harris Elias
Defendant:
Loveland, City of, William Gates and Antolina Hill
Hill v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Keilon Hill
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Bart Stark, Thomas Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garner v. City of Loveland et al
as 1:2021cv01035
Defendant:
Austin Hopp, City of Loveland, Philip Metzler and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archer v. Cook et al
as 1:2021cv02649
Plaintiff:
Celeste T. Archer
Defendant:
John Kroll, Sue Sharkey, Nolbert Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03649
Plaintiff:
Robin Hill
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Amazon.com
as 1:2020cv03090
Plaintiff:
Robin Hill
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
