Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stickler v. IBM, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02449
Plaintiff:
Michael Stickler
Defendant:
IBM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Atas v. The New York Times Company et al
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Nadire Atas
Defendant:
The New York Times Company, Dean Baquet, Ellen Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bey v. Daly et al
as 1:2018cv09359
Defendant:
Male Officer Donlon, Male Officer Daly and Male Officer Mazzela
Plaintiff:
Elijah Ibm Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bey v. Nugent et al
as 1:2018cv07878
Plaintiff:
Elijah Ibm Bey
Defendant:
P.O. John Nugent, Elisa Benjamin, Det. James Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Bey v. Conte et al
as 1:2018cv09594
Plaintiff:
Elijah Ibm Bey
Defendant:
Policy Enforcers, Evon M. Asforis, P.O. Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. NYCe Wheels et al
as 1:2018cv09358
Defendant:
Police Officer Mark Moore, 17th Precinct Detective Squad, NYCe Wheels and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Ibm Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Turret & Sunbelt Steel Company et al
as 1:2017cv00368
Defendant:
Apple Corp., Anthony Barna, CRM-INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khaimov v. US Enterprise Architecture Framework et al
as 1:2015cv09001
Plaintiff:
Roman Khaimov
Defendant:
US Enterprise Architecture Framework, Cyberwarefare, NYPD Sex Cyber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khaimov v. The United States Of America et al
as 1:2015cv08841
Plaintiff:
Roman Khaimov
Defendant:
The United States Of America, Super Computer Texas Enterprise, Architecture Framework and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sabet v. 3M, et al
as 1:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sabet and Sam Arthur Sabet
Defendant:
3M, First Union Bank, ABB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
