Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Holmes v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Maurice Holmes
Defendant:
Laboratory Corporation of America, Family Support Division (Clark County, Nevada) and Lammie King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Woodbury
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Gary D. Woodbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Woodbury
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Gary Woodbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Ceasars Entertainment Corporation
as 2:2021cv01003
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hubbard
Defendant:
Ceasars Entertainment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Reno Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00443
Defendant:
B Ball, Kevin Vogt, Reno Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice W. B. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stutts v. Lyon County et al
as 3:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Lyon, County of, Carson-Tahoe Health, Tyrell Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Stutts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Not Used
as 3:2019cv00550
Defendant:
Lyon, County of, Tyrell Joyner, Erik Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lee Stutts and Not Used
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bayard v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Bayard Maurice Antwon and Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik Brooks, Barack Hussein Obama and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood et al v. Mackay et al
as 3:2012cv00533
Defendant:
Lidia Aronova, Liz Babcock, James Day and others
Plaintiff:
Reno Movers LLC and Maurice Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearl v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2011cv01404
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearl
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
