Cases 1 - 10 of 30
COPELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Defendant:
DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as DAVID A. HUBERT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSSELL COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TACCINO et al v. WREN et al
as 1:2024cv01571
Defendant:
MISTY MICHAELS, CRAIG ROBERTSON, TODD HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL J. TACCINO and WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SEDITA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE SEDITA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
MITCHELL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE MITCHELL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
NAZARI v. MILGRAM et al
as 1:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
RAS LAZARUS NAZARI and BRUCE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE S. PAPADOPOULOS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FONTIL v. GARLAND
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
RAYCHEL FONTIL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KUMAR v. ATTORNEY GENERAL USA
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
ROHIT KUMAR
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL USA and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND and ASHLEY BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KELLY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS KELLY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, MERRICK GARLAND, REWARDS FOR JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
