Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Chrustowski v. Equal Employment Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Equal Employment Services, Emily Davis, Mai Hoang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chrustowski v. Johnson
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
Derrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chrustowski v. NAACP - Derrick Johnson
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Defendant:
NAACP - Derrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
De'Lante Moore
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bracy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Adaria Bracy
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Miguel Perez
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Thomas v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Megan Thomas
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Solito et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Zachary Solito and Justin Solito
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson and City of Dover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bozeman et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Rose Bozeman and Samiah Ortiz
Defendant:
Chief Thomas A. Johnson, City of Dover and John Doe Officers A & B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
