Cases 141 - 150 of 170
United States of America v. City of Walnut, California et al
as 2:2007cv02437
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
City of Walnut, California, The Walnut City Council, The Office of the Walnut City Manager and others
Counter Claimant:
City of Walnut, California, The Walnut City Council, The Office of the Walnut City Manager and others
Counter Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arnold v. Country Gourmet Restaurant of Mountain View et al
as 5:2007cv01299
Plaintiff:
Connie Arnold
Defendant:
A&D Protocol Transportation, Inc., A&D Protocol Transportation, Inc., Mary Jo Shaw and others
Mediator:
Robin W. Siefkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Wooten v. The City of Stockton
as 2:2006cv02789
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lopez, et al. v. County of Merced. et al.
as 1:2006cv01526
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tripple AAA Association for Children with Developmental Disabilities v. Wongs Golden Palace Inc et al
as 3:2006cv01925
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Heredia et al v. Santa Clara County et al
as 5:2006cv04718
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paralyzed Veterans of America et al v. McPherson et al
as 4:2006cv04670
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holder et al v. McPherson et al
as 4:2006cv02923
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rancho San Juan Opposition Coalition et al v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Monterey et al
as 5:2006cv02369
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bonilla, et al v. Barnett, et al
as 1:2006cv00375
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
