Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Buck et al v. Barbour et al
as 3:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Buck , Thomas Pucket , Jeanette Self and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Jim Hood , Delbert Hosemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Barbour et al THREE JUDGE PANEL: LEE, JOLLY, GUIROLA
as 3:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Thomas Plunkett , Rod Woullard and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour , Jim Hood , Delbert Hosemann and others
Intervenor:
Apportionment and Elections Committee of the Mississippi House of Representatives and Terry C. Burton
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MS Senate Democratic Caucus and Individual MS Democratic Senators
Intervenor_defendant:
Sidney Bondurant , Becky Currie and Mary Ann Stevens
Amicu:
The Mississippi Tea Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh et al v. Barbour et al
as 4:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Pierce McIntosh , Betty Davis , Roy Stanford and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, James Hood and The Mississippi Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. The Wilkinson County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert Morgan, James Jolliff, Jr. and Eugene Tolliver, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilkinson County, Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, Wilkinson County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith, et al v. Clark, et al
as 3:2001cv00855
Plaintiff:
John Robert Smith , Shirley Hall and Gene Walker
Defendant:
Eric Clark , Mike Moore , Ronnie Musgrove and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Beatrice J. Branch , Rims Barber , L C Dorsey and others
Movant:
Jimmy D. Giles and Kenneth J. Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
