Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Preeti Doe v. Rochelle Sterling et al
as 2:2023cv10061
Plaintiff:
Preeti Doe
Defendant:
Rochelle Sterling, The Sterling Family Trust, Beverly Hills Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Al Tudor Dupont et al v. Sterling Family Trust et al
as 2:2023cv09785
Petitioner:
Al Tudor Dupont and Aurelia Anderson
Defendant:
c/o Sterling Family Trust, Beverly Hills Properties, LLC and Sterling Family Trust
Interested Party:
Hana Kommel Williams, Brandon Lawrence and Lauren Langer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Donald Sterling et al
as 2:2022cv02279
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV, United African-Asian Abilities Club and others
Defendant:
DONALD STERLING, TRUSTEE, ROCHELLE H. STERLING, TRUSTEE, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Megan Rainville et al v. Sterling Riverside
as 5:2016cv01421
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Phoebe Mar and Megan Rainville
Defendant:
STERLING HIGHLANDER and Sterling Riverside
Shawn Sterling v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2009cv00919
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sterling
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Gasparini and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Darrell Rhodes et al v. Donald Sterling, et al
as 2:2007cv07234
Defendant:
The Korean Land Company, Sterling Family Trust, DOES 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rhodes, D. R., M. R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Housing Rights Ctr, et al v. Donald Sterling, et al
as 2:2003cv00859
Plaintiff:
Housing Rights Center, Karlene Henry, Thomas NMI Brown and others
Petitioner:
Craig Hubble, Douglas Walton and Michael D Morris
Defendant:
Donald Sterling, Donald Sterling Corporation, Beverly Hills Properties and others
Intervenor:
Century Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
