Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Fernandes v. Briotte et al
as 1:2015cv12580
Plaintiff:
William M. Fernandes
Defendant:
Andre Briotte, Jr., Anthony D. Williams, Briane M. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lu v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv10920
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Martin J. Walsh, William F. Sinnott, Eugene L. O'Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lu v. Menino et al
as 1:2014cv13053
Defendant:
Thomas M. Menino , Martin J. Walsh , William F. Sinnott and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Langadinos v. W.R. Berkley Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv11159
Plaintiff:
Gregory Langadinos
Defendant:
W.R. Berkley Corporation, William R. Berkley, Acadia Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Melanson v. Nelson et al
as 1:2011cv11673
Plaintiff:
Herman R. Melanson
Defendant:
William T. Nelson, Lee M. Nelson, Joanne Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fraine v. Massad et al
as 4:2008cv40242
Plaintiff:
Francis K. Fraine
Defendant:
David G. Massad, Marcello Mallegni, Michael Norris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bradley v. Massad et al
as 4:2008cv40125
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Bradley
Defendant:
David G. Massad, Commerce Bank & Trust Company, Marcello Mallegni and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laverty v. Massad et al
as 4:2008cv40126
Plaintiff:
Bernard J Laverty, Jr.
Defendant:
David G. Massad, David Mandara, Marcello Mallegni and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laverty v. Massad et al
as 1:2008cv11094
Plaintiff:
Bernard J Laverty, Jr.
Defendant:
David G. Massad, David Mandara, Marcello Mallegni and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bradley v. Massad et al
as 1:2008cv11095
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Bradley
Defendant:
David G. Massad, Commerce Bank & Trust Company, Marcello Mallegni and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
