Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Walsh-Duffy et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv20331
Plaintiff:
Angela Walsh-Duffy and Brett Freeman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Walsh-Duffy et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv08780
Plaintiff:
Angela Walsh-Duffy, Angela Walsh-Duffy, Brett Freeman and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Local 14 -14B of the International Union of Operating Engineers
as 1:2008cv03046
Interested Party:
Ethical Practices Attorney of International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, Lawrence Persico, Nicholas Lupari and others
Intervenor:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 15, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D and 15H and International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
James Mascarella and Local 14 -14B of the International Union of Operating Engineers
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SEBASTIAN RIVER HOLDING'S, INC. et al v. ETRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv05486
Plaintiff:
SEBASTIAN RIVER HOLDING'S, INC., DANIEL DUFFY, STEPHANIE MANLEY and others
Defendant:
ETRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, J. DOES 1-5 and ABC COMPANIES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ha v. Burr et al
as 4:2007cv04699
Plaintiff:
Hung Ha
Defendant:
Kenneth Mark Burr, Marie Mayupao, Thomas Orloff and others
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ha v. Burr et al
as 3:2007cv04699
Plaintiff:
Hung Ha
Defendant:
Kenneth Mark Burr, Marie Mayupao, Thomas Orloff and others
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
