Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Garris et al v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv02372
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris, Raymond C. Garris, Mae E. Garris Bradley and others
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Anthony G. Brown, Douglas F. Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Littlejohn v. Ocwen Financial Corporation Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC,: (as Servicer) et al
as 8:2012cv01383
Plaintiff:
Albert Littlejohn
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC,: (as Servicer), Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Linda M. McCauley- Individually and D/B/A RealHome Services and Solutions Inc., Ace Securities Corporation: (as Depositor) Ace Securities Corp., Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-FM-1, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates (as Trust) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Harrell et al v. Bealefeld et al
as 1:2011cv03046
Plaintiff:
Mark Harrell and Roslyn Wiggins
Defendant:
Frederick Bealefeld, III , Joseph M. Donato and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glascoe v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2010cv00710
Plaintiff:
Deirdre C. Glascoe
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, Jack B. Johnson, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clean Venture, Inc. v. Sparrows Point Metal Recovery, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv03059
Plaintiff:
Clean Venture, Inc. and Clean Venture, Inc.
Defendant:
Sparrows Point Metal Recovery, LLC, Barletta Engineering Corporation, SPS Limited Partnership, LLLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Proctor et al v. Metropolitan Money Store Corp. et al
as 8:2007cv01957
Plaintiff:
Melvin J. Proctor, Jr., Melvin J. Proctor, Jr., Melvin J. Proctor, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Money Store Corp., Fordham and Fordham Investment Group, LTD., RTE Title & Escrow, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
