Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 92
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
School District No. 1, Yamhill County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07256
Plaintiff: School District No. 1, Yamhill County, Oregon and Yamhill-Carlton School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 2J, Deschutes County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07259
Plaintiff: School District No. 2J, Deschutes County, Oregon and Redmond School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 15, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07260
Plaintiff: School District No. 15, Marion County, Oregon and North Marion School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 5, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07258
Plaintiff: School District No. 5, Marion County, Oregon and Cascade School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 29, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01784
Plaintiff: School District No. 29, Marion County, Oregon and North Santiam School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Portland, Oregon v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07045
Plaintiff: City of Portland, Oregon
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No.1, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07063
Plaintiff: School District No.1, Marion County, Oregon and Gervais School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 48J, Yamhill County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07061
Plaintiff: School District No. 48J, Yamhill County, Oregon and Sheridan School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07062
Plaintiff: School District No. 2, Polk County, Oregon and Dallas School District
Defendant: Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 24J, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01750
Plaintiff: School District No. 24J, Marion County, Oregon and Salem-Keizer Public Schools
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?