Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 41 - 46 of 46
TEG Staffing, Inc. v. D. Platt, et al
as 08-17504
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEG STAFFING, INC., a California Corporation doing business as Platinum Legal
Defendant - Appellee: D. ALEXANDER PLATT, an individual, SANDY COSTICK, an individual and JOHN COSTICK, an individual
Arunga et al v. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02525
Plaintiff: James AggreyKweggyirr Arunga and Doreen H. Lee
Defendant: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Nicole Ozer, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes Both
TEG Staffing, Inc. v. Platt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv03073
Plaintiff: TEG Staffing, Inc. and TEG Staffing, Inc.
Defendant: D. Alexander Platt, Sandy Costick and John Costick
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rumble v. Phoenix Brokers, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00123
Plaintiff: Sandy Rumble and Sandy Rumble
Defendant: Phoenix Brokers, Inc., Contractors Bonding Limited and Contractors Bonding Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff: John Prymak, John Prymak, Lillian Prymak and others
Defendant: Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc., Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc., Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Rogers, et al v. Nacchio, et al
as 0:2005cv60667
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets. Inc., Unknown Officers and Directors of Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Joseph P. Nacchio and others
Plaintiff: William M. Rogers and C. Mylett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?