Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edmiston et al v. EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Diane Edmiston and Diane Edmiston as Trustee of the Winston N. Wikmorski Trust
Defendant:
EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLC, EasyKnock, Inc. and LendingOne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Julia Wolov v. David Duel, et al
as 23-55303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA WOLOV, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DUEL, REBECCA DUEL, ILANA YAMTOOBIAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Electronic Waveform Lab, Inc. v. EK Health Services et al
as 2:2015cv08061
Defendant:
Johanna Appel, M.D., Garrett M. Casey, D.C., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Electronic Waveform Lab, Inc.
Storehouse Credit Union Ek. for. v. Cusumano et al
as 6:2010cv00850
Plaintiff:
Storehouse Credit Union Ek. for.
Defendant:
Samuel Cusumano, Linda Cusumano, Vital Management Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
