Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Devin Wade v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 5:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. Central District of California
as 5:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. Andre Birotte
as 5:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Honorable Andre Birotte, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force
as 5:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devin Wade v. Executive Office for US Attorneys
as 5:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Devin Wade
Defendant:
Executive Office for US Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Collier v. Trump
as 23-2420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINA COLLIER, and for all similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CA NEWSOME, GOVERNOR OF FL and others
Collier v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Irina Collier
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Governor of CA Newsome, Governor of FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Irina Collier v. Charles Collier, et al
as 23-55126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES WADE COLLIER, Collier-Garbers Trust Fund and IDEAS, INC.
Collier v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Irina Collier
Defendant:
Charles Wade Collier and Ideas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Collier v. President of Stanford
as 23-1185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINA COLLIER, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF STANFORD, WEBMASTER OF STANFORD, UCB CHANCELLOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
