Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LU v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR, LESLIE MILLER GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOMEZ et al v. ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
WALTER GOMEZ, JUAN MANUEL VALDIVIEZO, MARIA LAURA VALDIVIEZO and others
Defendant:
ABC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, ABC CAPITAL RE LTD, ABC CAPITAL RE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boldrini et al v. Giovannini et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini, Michael J. Pega, Jr. and Daniele A. Boldrini
Defendant:
Joseph P. Giovannini, Mary Pamela Amos, Marianne Cameli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
PHILLIPS v. CITIBANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv05683
Plaintiff:
WALTER G. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A. and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STONEBACK v. ARTSQUEST et al
as 5:2012cv03287
Plaintiff:
REBECCA STONEBACK
Defendant:
ARTSQUEST, JEFFREY PARKS, WALTER KEIPER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DISANDRO et al v. RICHARD W. HOY ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2011cv03341
Plaintiff:
ENRICO DISANDRO , JOSEPH EGAN , RANDY HUDSON and others
Defendant:
RICHARD W. HOY ASSOCIATES , DAVID K. LEHMAN and DAVID K. LEHMAN & ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
