Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Taylor et al v. KKR & Co., L.P. et al
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tia Taylor, Ashley Hall-Nagy and Bobby Estes
Defendant:
KKR & Co., L.P., Henry R. Kravis, George R. Roberts and others
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Humana Financial Recovery & Subrogation et al v. Edward Hospital et al
as 3:2017cv00669
Plaintiff:
Humana Financial Recovery & Subrogation and Stephen P. Wallace
Defendant:
Edward Hospital, William R. Sterba, Keith B. Hanni and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Laudien et al v. Caudill et al
as 7:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Victoria Laudien
Defendant:
Donna Caudill , Tracy Blair, Lacy Crothers and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller et al v. First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00206
Plaintiff:
William P. Miller , Marilyn Kleier , Edin Sehic and others
Defendant:
First Federal Savings Bank of Elizabethtown, Inc. , Lawrence A. Shapin and Steven R. Berg
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Baker et al v. Plummer et al
as 5:2008cv00321
Plaintiff:
Neil Baker, Neil Baker, Anne Baker and others
Defendant:
David Plummer, Spencer Plummer, Tony Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goyak et al v. ClassicStar Racing Stable, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
John Goyak, John Goyak, John Goyak and others
Defendant:
ClassicStar Racing Stable, LLC, ClassicStar 2003 Racing Partnership, LLC, Georstar Financial Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cadle v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Cadle, Daniel C. Cadle and Daniel C. Cadle
Defendant:
William J. Jefferson, William J. Jefferson, Andrea G. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
