Cases 151 - 160 of 304
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bonavita et al
as 3:2010cv30028
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cheryl S Bonavita and Ebenezer Choos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., v. Rajan et al
as 4:2010cv40029
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.,
Defendant:
Rajalaksnmi Rajan, Shyamala Rajan, Rajan Viswanathan and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Santaniello et al
as 3:2010cv30027
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Helen Santaniello and House of Pour, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Zuffa, LLC v. Brady et al
as 1:2010cv10004
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Derek Brady and Metro Dining Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Doucette et al v. Bank of New York et al
as 1:2009cv10607
Plaintiff:
David Doucette and Lynne Doucette
Defendant:
Bank of New York, Saxon Mortgage Company, Saxon Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Comcast of Southern New England, Inc. v. Petroules
as 1:2008cv10345
Plaintiff:
Comcast of Southern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
James Petroules
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc. v. Bechara
as 1:2008cv10326
Plaintiff:
Comcast of Massachusetts I, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph Bechara
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Comcast of Southern New England, Inc. v. Saber
as 1:2008cv10327
Plaintiff:
Comcast of Southern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Natalie Saber
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Comcast of Massachusetts III, Inc v. Connors
as 4:2007cv40320
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Comcast of Southern New England, Inc. v. Costa
as 1:2007cv12395
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
