Cases 61 - 70 of 5,984
(HC) Arauza v. USA (2255- (2:18-cr-00202)
as 2:2023cv02263
Petitioner:
Gabriel Vicente Arauza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jurijus Kadamovas v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08289
Petitioner:
Jurijus Kadamovas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Flucas v. USA
as 2:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Rodney Flucas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright II, Stephen V. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maggay v. USA
as 4:2023cv04899
Petitioner:
Roderick Maggay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collazo v. USA
as 3:2023cv01761
Petitioner:
Robert Collazo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC) Bray v. USA - 2255 2:22-cr-0077 KJM)
as 2:2023cv02057
Petitioner:
Jeffrey James Bray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Todd Eugene Cannady v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01686
Petitioner:
Todd Eugene Cannady
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
John Franklin Friedlander v. Jacob Doerer
as 5:2023cv01603
Petitioner:
John Franklin Friedlander
Respondent:
Jacob Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01591
Petitioner:
Julio Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
