Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4610
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4377
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Antonio v. Edenfield et al
as 1:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
Aaron Austin Antonio
Defendant:
Karen Edenfield, Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00286
Petitioner:
Paul Edward Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America, Bureau Of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Montoya v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00598
Plaintiff:
Miguel Manuel Montoya
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeff Thomas, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Patrick v. Lappin
as 1:2008cv01089
Petitioner:
Richard David Patrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Luna v. United States of America et al
as 6:2008cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Reynaldo Luna
Defendant:
United States of America, John Conway, David Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fuentes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Petitioner:
Sonny Fuentes
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America, Alan C. Kay and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martinez vs. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00882
Plaintiff:
Benito Victor Martinez
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
