Cases 91 - 100 of 3,631
Allen v. Fuchs
as 2:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
James Allen
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mull v. Fuchs
as 2:2023cv01638
Petitioner:
Jovan Mull and Jovan T Mull
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin-Andrade v. Benzel
as 2:2023cv01722
Petitioner:
Hector M Martin-Andrade
Respondent:
Jason Benzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBrow, Eric v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Eric James DeBrow
Respondent:
Randall Hepp and WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Mike Maxwell, Hon Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Utecht, Daniel v. Buesgen, Christopher
as 3:2023cv00792
Petitioner:
Daniel D. Utecht
Respondent:
Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
LaMondre Moore
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solberg v. Hachey et al
as 2:2023cv01590
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
C Hachey, J Kozulla and B Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blunt v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01533
Petitioner:
Lamarr Deprice Blunt
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardipee v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv01718
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Gardipee
Respondent:
Kevin A Carr and Todd Delain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
