Cases 101 - 110 of 55,860
Alonzo Vernon v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00694
Petitioner:
Alonzo Vernon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Irving Aguilar-Calixto v. Thomas Tyler
as 8:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Irving Aguilar-Calixto
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Corderick v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Robinson v. Pettijohn
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Gareth Warren Robinson
Respondent:
Lindy Pettijohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corderick v. Warden C.S.P. Solano
as 3:2024cv01939
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden C.S.P. Solano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Fawcett v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Mark Fawcett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNLAP v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 3:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of California
as 5:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rosalee Smith
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Solomon v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner:
Lakquan D. Solomon
Respondent:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
