Cases 111 - 120 of 128
Mora v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2007cv00830
Petitioner:
Michael Fredric Mora
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan and Harold Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lawrence Taylor v. W. J. Sullivan
as 5:2007cv00687
Petitioner:
Michael Lawrence Taylor
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2007cv00494
Petitioner:
Robert A. Ortiz
Respondent:
W J Sullivan and Jerry Brown, -
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendiola v. Sullivan
as 3:2007cv00130
Petitioner:
Michael Mendiola
Respondent:
W J Sullivan and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Scott Copeland v. W J Sullivan
as 5:2007cv00522
Petitioner:
David Scott Copeland
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Sullivan
as 8:2007cv00486
Petitioner:
Javen Anthony Cervantes
Respondent:
W J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Justice Martinez v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2007cv02607
Petitioner:
Christopher Justice Martinez
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antwan Terrelle Jones v. W.J. Sullivan
as 2:2007cv02078
Petitioner:
Antwan Terrelle Jones
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plummer v. Sullivan
as 1:2007cv00467
Petitioner:
William Pierce Plummer
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juan Moya v. W J Sullivan
as 2:2007cv01598
Petitioner:
Juan Moya
Respondent:
W J Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
