Cases 121 - 130 of 201
Thompson v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Alvin Da'Von Thompson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. Epps
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Yildirim Erol Ali
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Epps
as 3:2009cv00586
Plaintiff:
Eric Kennedy
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00544
Plaintiff:
Montrell Jordan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Danny Scott and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. Taylor et al
as 3:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Johnny Crump
Defendant:
Michelle Taylor, Maragret Bingham, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00214
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Perry
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riley v. Epps
as 2:2009cv00137
Plaintiff:
Roy Roderick Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Epps
as 2:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trice v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00154
Petitioner:
Michael Trice
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Shannon Warnock and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00124
Petitioner:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
