General Cases filed in California
Cases 121 - 130 of 156
Tom Lashon Murphy v. V M Almager
as 2:2007cv04290
Petitioner: Tom Lashon Murphy
Respondent: V M Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andre Bennett v. Felker
as 2:2007cv04073
Petitioner: Andre' Bennett
Respondent: Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gullatt vs Felker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00873
Petitioner: John Gullatt
Respondent: Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gullatt vs Felker
as 1:2007at00287
Petitioner: John Gullatt
Respondent: Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Darryl Lynn Davis v. Tom Felker
as 2:2007cv03861
Petitioner: Darryl Lynn Davis
Respondent: Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morley v. Carey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01083
Respondent: Tom L. Carey
Petitioner: Fred Morley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCurdy v. Mayberg et al
as 2:2007cv01059
Petitioner: Rex A. McCurdy
Respondent: Stephen W Mayberg and Tom Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon-Silva v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv01011
Petitioner: Marcelino Calderon-Silva
Respondent: Tom L. Carey and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Carey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01001
Petitioner: Noel Phillips Scott
Respondent: Tom L. Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Felker
as 1:2007at00236
Petitioner: Michael Malone
Respondent: Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?