Cases 121 - 130 of 4,833
Trotter v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Jared M Trotter and Jared M. Trotter
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lasley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Tori Lynn Lasley
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferrell v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Johnny Van Ferrell, Jr
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tibbetts v. Rogers
as 5:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
Kenneth H Tibbetts
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spalding v. Administrative Offfices of the US Courts et al
as 5:2023cv00905
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
Administrative Offfices of the US Courts and Federal Public Defenders Office
Defendant:
Administration Office of the US Courts and Warden FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Deluna v. Harpe
as 5:2023cv00890
Petitioner:
Luke E Deluna
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyce v. United States
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Jennifer Boyce
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. Dowling
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Steve A White
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
