Cases 121 - 130 of 3,636
Sease v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Daniel D Sease
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vogel, Jacob v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Jacob D. Vogel
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
DeWayne D Knight
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Jovan v. Fox, Eric et al
as 3:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jovan Williams
Defendant:
Eric R. Fox, Rebecca J. Tervonen, Michael C. Dotson and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowell v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01345
Petitioner:
Denard A Rowell
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Jatavious Kawan Webster
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter, Renardo v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Renardo Liquori Carter
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin and Wood County Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01335
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Waukesha County, Honorable Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Keyes
as 3:2023cv00667
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Magwood, Earl v. Keyes
as 3:2023cv00665
Petitioner:
Earl C. Magwood
Respondent:
FCI Warden Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
