Cases 121 - 130 of 6,723
NISSIM v. CHARLES et al
as 2:2023cv22992
Petitioner:
EFRAIM NISSIM
Respondent:
WARDEN RON CHARLES and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOTO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv22945
Petitioner:
MANUEL ANTONIO SOTO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv22937
Petitioner:
BRIAN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv21017
Petitioner:
ROBERT H. MARTIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PAPASAVVAS v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2023cv22165
Petitioner:
PETER PAPASAVVAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEPACK v. UNION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 2:2023cv20980
Petitioner:
ROY DEPACK
Respondent:
UNION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERDOMO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv21482
Petitioner:
RAMIRO BENJUME PERDOMO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRICE v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv21140
Petitioner:
CHARLES BRICE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WAYS v. MATHES et al
as 1:2023cv20843
Petitioner:
JOHN WAYS
Respondent:
JOHN MATHES, STEVEN LAUITSEN and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MENDEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv21659
Petitioner:
RUDI RENE MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
