General Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 121 - 130 of 4,830
Smith v. LA MDC
as 5:2023cv00996
Petitioner: Nicois Megale Smith
Respondent: LA MDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner: Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trotter v. Harpe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00348
Petitioner: Jared M Trotter and Jared M. Trotter
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danmola v. Goldey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00825
Petitioner: Yusufu Danmola
Respondent: Warden Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lasley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner: Tori Lynn Lasley
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Sweat
as 4:2023cv00417
Petitioner: Shayna Lauren Sims
Respondent: Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner: Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholson v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00377
Petitioner: Bryan Douglas Nicholson
Respondent: Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00318
Petitioner: Raymond A. Ray
Respondent: Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Buss We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00856
Petitioner: Marcus D Ford
Respondent: David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?