Cases 131 - 140 of 55,857
Gage v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02100
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Gage
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felipe Cabrera-Huato v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2024cv02892
Petitioner:
Felipe Cabrera-Huato
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph Lee Haddick v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00744
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Haddick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michelle Estelle Caldera v. A. Delacruz
as 2:2024cv02937
Petitioner:
Michelle Estelle Caldera
Respondent:
A. Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Extend Time to File
Jose Antonio Paisano Coyopol v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02901
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Paisano Coyopol
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Roger Hood v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv02903
Petitioner:
Daniel Roger Hood
Respondent:
Warden, Superior Court of San Diego and County of San Diego of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams
as 3:2024cv02097
Petitioner:
Antoine Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01041
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Govenor Newsome And Marin County
as 4:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Govenor Newsome And Marin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mark James Lyon v. Gena Jones
as 2:2024cv02812
Petitioner:
Mark James Lyon
Respondent:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
