Cases 131 - 140 of 2,111
Suppes v. Stafford, County of
as 5:2022cv03224
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Suppes
Respondent:
Stafford, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins (ID 70273) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03208
Petitioner:
Roger Allen Collins, Jr.
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michalec v. Payne
as 5:2022cv03205
Petitioner:
Ryan Joe Michalec
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Larned State Hospital
as 5:2022cv03206
Petitioner:
Kirk Franklin Williams and Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey
Respondent:
Larned State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Armbrister
as 5:2022cv03201
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watts v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2022cv03195
Petitioner:
James Brent Watts
Respondent:
Lucifer (lnu), (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas (ID 96000) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03194
Petitioner:
Benito Cardenas, Jr.
Respondent:
Ness, City of, Kansas and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03192
Petitioner:
Carlos M. Young
Respondent:
(fnu) Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods (ID 77647) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2022cv03189
Petitioner:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coles v. Hudson
as 5:2022cv03183
Petitioner:
Ian Barkley Coles
Respondent:
Don Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
