Cases 141 - 150 of 1,413
Martin v. Hess
as 3:2022cv01356
Petitioner:
Robert H Martin
Respondent:
Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Szanyi v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv01253
Petitioner:
Karen Szanyi
Defendant:
Pullen
Respondent:
BOP and T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01190
Petitioner:
Firoz Patel
Respondent:
Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosa v. Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2022cv01226
Petitioner:
Alexander Rosa
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zenquis v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
David Morales Zenquis
Defendant:
T. Pullen, Caverly and Eftaxas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dinh v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01147
Petitioner:
Truong Jason Dinh
Respondent:
Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dinh v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01146
Petitioner:
Truong Jason Dinh
Respondent:
Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carpenter v. United States Probation and Pretrial Services
as 3:2022cv01268
Petitioner:
Daniel E. Carpenter
Respondent:
United States Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 3:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden and Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Crookedarm v. Tribal Courts
as 3:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ian Jack Crookedarm
Defendant:
Tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
