Cases 161 - 170 of 6,737
RIVAS-RIVAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20784
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR RIVAS-RIVAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DESPOSITO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20627
Petitioner:
SONNY DESPOSITO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMIREZ CARVALLOS v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv20646
Petitioner:
PEDRO LUIS RAMIREZ CARVALLOS
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOMEZ-ENAMORADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20648
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER GOMEZ-ENAMORADO
Respondent:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CORTES-MARTINEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv20586
Petitioner:
JAVIER CORTES-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MALDONADO v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20546
Petitioner:
AMADO MALDONADO
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANCHINGRE v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv20486
Petitioner:
JIMMI MARZANA CANCHINGRE
Respondent:
ANDY CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHAKUR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv20537
Petitioner:
MALIK SHAKUR
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRINSON v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv20462
Petitioner:
IVERY BRINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORD v. SCOTT
as 2:2023cv20426
Petitioner:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Respondent:
MRS. BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
