Cases 161 - 170 of 55,860
Frank Monaco Bazzo v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan Anderson v. Bryan Burkholz
as 2:2024cv01761
Petitioner:
Alan Anderson
Respondent:
Bryan Burkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03293
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Luna Luna
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles Newman v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2024cv02167
Petitioner:
Charles Newman
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erick Emilio Jimenez Orihuela v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02684
Petitioner:
Erick Emilio Jimenez Orihuela
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dyer v. Pearce
as 3:2024cv01405
Petitioner:
Jewel E. Dyer
Respondent:
Timothy Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keenan George v. Tent Allen
as 2:2024cv02096
Petitioner:
Keenan George
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aurelio Martinez Rodriguez v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
Aurelio Martinez Rodriguez
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Salazar-Mendoza v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Alejandro Salazar-Mendoza
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
